France’s civil society–centred diplomacy reshapes Middle East policy, advancing peacebuilding, regulatory change and EU coordination in conflict zones

The rocket alert notifications buzzing on phones during a diplomatic meeting at the Élysée Palace captured the stark reality of Middle East peacebuilding in 2025. As French President Emmanuel Macron met with Israeli and Palestinian civil society representatives on Friday evening, Iran launched a counterattack on Israel, striking Tel Aviv. The convergence of violence and diplomacy represented France’s unprecedented decision to integrate grassroots actors directly into international diplomatic efforts during an active security crisis.
The meeting formed part of the Paris Call for Peace, hosted under Macron’s high patronage by the Paris Peace Forum and co-organised by the Alliance for Middle East Peace (ALLMEP). The gathering brought together hundreds of Israeli and Palestinian peacebuilders, marking the largest shared civil society assembly since October 2024.
France has become the first G7 country to operationalise the group’s 2024 commitment to institutionalise support for Israeli-Palestinian civil society peacebuilding. While the G7’s approach traditionally focused on high-level diplomatic coordination, the Paris meeting represented a move toward treating grassroots actors as essential partners rather than peripheral observers.
The Alliance for Middle East Peace, which coordinates over 170 civil society organisations, has been advocating for this multilateral backing. The coalition has secured over $90 million in US funding through legislative efforts like the Middle East Partnership for Peace Act and is building an International Fund for Israeli-Palestinian Peace aimed at providing at least $200 million annually to scale grassroots peacebuilding.
Macron’s remarks to attendees emphasised civil society’s central role in any lasting peace process. ‘If you want to stop war and dismantle the consequences of war,’ he said, ‘you have to present, provide and implement a reasonable political hope – which is exactly two states living together, two people respecting each other, and people like you, endorsing the capacity to live with somebody with another story.’
The timing created an almost surreal diplomatic environment. ‘The dissonance was hard to explain,’ said John Lyndon, Executive Director of ALLMEP. ‘On the one hand, we were meeting with the French President, in his beautiful residence, hearing him speaking powerfully about the importance of this work, and its essential role in shaping a more peaceful reality. On the other, it was one of the most dangerous nights the Middle East has seen in decades, with our members stranded in Paris, and their families – both Israeli and Palestinian – in terror, as missiles were raining down.’
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss a story. No spam, ever.

Europe wants nuclear power back. But the money is token, the reactors are unproven, and the energy crisis is already here.

Labour's UK EU deal delivers frictionless trade outside the single market. You would think the Brexiteers would be thrilled. They are furious (shock horror).

The EU Commission president admitted that Europe's rejection of nuclear power was driven by ideology, not evidence. Fifteen years later, she is doing it again with age verification.
Despite the escalation, participants finalised a collective call to action emphasising immediate and permanent ceasefire, release of all hostages and unconditional delivery of humanitarian aid commensurate with Gaza’s needs. The statement called for mutual recognition and a renewed diplomatic process with civil society at its core.
France’s approach signals potential changes in how international aid frameworks operate in conflict zones. By formally integrating civil society into diplomatic efforts, the policy could influence regulatory frameworks affecting business and humanitarian operations in the region. Traditional aid distribution often flows through government channels, but France’s model suggests increased direct funding to grassroots organisations.
Companies operating in the Middle East could face new opportunities and requirements, particularly those involved in humanitarian supply chains, reconstruction projects and social impact investments. Civil society organisations often serve as crucial local partners for international businesses seeking to navigate complex political environments while maintaining community relationships.
The emphasis on mutual recognition and renewed diplomatic processes could affect future EU Middle East policy coordination. With France leading on civil society integration, other European nations may face pressure to adopt similar approaches, potentially standardising how international funding reaches conflict-affected communities.
The Paris meeting occurred alongside broader diplomatic challenges. A UN conference on the two-state solution, co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, was postponed this week due to escalating tensions and security concerns. The postponement highlights how traditional diplomatic structures struggle to function during active conflict, making France’s civil society approach more significant.
The model also arrives as international sanctions create additional complexity for regional operations. Recent coordinated sanctions by Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway against Israeli officials accused of inciting West Bank violence demonstrate increased multilateral coordination on Middle East policy.
‘It has been an intense few days,’ said Nivine Sandouka, ALLMEP’s Regional Director, who read the statement at the event’s close. ‘As one of my colleagues said at the conference, we are condemned to hope. We’re grateful for Macron’s support of civil society, and eager to see the implementation of these ideas. If we see top-down diplomacy combined with bottom-up civil society activism and action, we can help make this the last ever Israeli-Palestinian war.’
France’s inclusive approach could influence future multilateral negotiations and business environments in the region. As civil society organisations gain formal recognition in diplomatic processes, companies may find new partnership opportunities and funding mechanisms for regional projects. The integration of grassroots perspectives into policy formation could also create more nuanced regulatory frameworks that better reflect ground-level realities.
Whether other G7 members follow France’s lead in operationalising civil society commitments will likely depend on the practical outcomes of this approach. The test will be whether formal diplomatic recognition translates into tangible policy changes and increased funding streams that reach communities most affected by the conflict.