British businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions face mounting challenges with sales tax compliance as financial software systems struggle to keep pace with complex regulatory requirements. Recent industry analysis reveals that companies are increasingly frustrated with their current systems’ inefficiencies, leading to significant tax overpayments and compliance risks.
The Growing Complexity of Multi-State Tax Compliance
As states modernise their tax codes and enforcement mechanisms, businesses face unprecedented challenges in managing their tax obligations. According to William Flick, Managing Partner at EisnerAmper Advisory Group, LLC, most companies’ financial software contains critical gaps in managing sales tax charges, particularly when operating across state lines.
No ads. No tracking.
We don’t run ads or share your data. If you value independent content and real privacy, support us by sharing.
Read More
State tax enforcement has grown increasingly aggressive , with authorities implementing sophisticated tools to identify discrepancies and non-compliance. This heightened scrutiny makes it essential for businesses to address common software limitations that often result in tax overpayments.
Critical Software Limitations
The investigation by EisnerAmper Advisory Group has identified nine key areas where financial software systems frequently fall short. These include outdated tax rate databases due to infrequent updates and rigid systems that prevent adjustments to vendor invoices after entry. Perhaps most critically, many systems lack proper consideration of sales tax nexus nuances – the rules determining when companies must collect and remit sales tax in different jurisdictions.
Additional limitations encompass automatic approval of sales tax charges without proper verification and conflicts between headquarters and satellite office approvals. Many systems also struggle with fundamental tasks such as segmenting sales tax on invoices and determining the correct originating and receiving states for transactions.
Financial Impact and Risk Exposure
Industry research indicates that non-compliance with current sales tax regulations can lead to substantial penalties and legal consequences. However, the more immediate concern for many businesses is the significant overpayment of sales tax due to software limitations.
Back-office employees often lack proper training in sales tax nexus requirements, compounding the software limitations. This knowledge gap, combined with embedded system errors, creates a perfect storm for tax compliance issues and financial inefficiencies.
Evolving Regulatory Landscape
Current tax trends show that 25 states now tax Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings, with seven additional states implementing taxes when software downloads are required. This expanding scope of taxable digital services adds another layer of complexity to compliance requirements.
States are also updating their economic nexus thresholds, with some jurisdictions eliminating transaction-based triggers in favour of pure sales-volume thresholds. These changes require businesses to maintain more sophisticated tracking and reporting capabilities than many current financial software systems provide.
Solutions and Best Practices
To address these challenges, businesses must first recognise that their financial software may not be providing adequate sales tax management. Regular software updates, comprehensive staff training and systematic review processes are essential steps toward improving compliance and preventing overpayments.
Industry experts recommend investing in systems capable of monitoring and reporting sales volumes by state, ensuring proper registration for sales tax permits where economic nexus thresholds are met. Companies should also consider implementing dedicated tax compliance solutions that can integrate with existing financial software to address these specific challenges.
As tax authorities continue to enhance their enforcement capabilities and regulatory requirements evolve, businesses must prioritise addressing these software limitations. The cost of inaction – whether through tax overpayments or compliance penalties – far exceeds the investment required to implement proper solutions and training programmes.
