Automated leadership development tools offer scalable solutions to close the skills gap among mid-level managers and boost organisational performance

Most businesses know they need better leaders beyond the executive suite, yet mid-level managers and team leaders often fend for themselves when it comes to development. Recent research from the DDI Global Leadership Forecast 2023 shows only 12% of organisations feel prepared to replace key leadership roles – the largest drop in leadership confidence in a decade.
Leadership development has traditionally been expensive and limited to a select few at the top. While 82% of CEOs rank developing next-generation leaders higher than economic risks, cost and time remain the biggest barriers for business owners trying to implement effective leadership programmes.
Only 40% of managers believe their company has high-quality leaders, marking a 17% decline over two years. Half of CEOs identify nurturing future leaders as their top organisational challenge, yet most leadership development budgets can’t stretch beyond senior executives.
Traditional executive coaching programmes typically cost between $1,200 to over $4,000 per participant, making it financially unfeasible to extend these programmes to every people manager. This creates a development gap for mid-level managers – the very people responsible for day-to-day team performance and employee engagement.
The partnership between HR.com and MultiRater Surveys aims to change this by making automated leadership development tools accessible to all people managers, not just executives. HR.com’s 2 million professional members gain access to MultiRater’s MyMentor platform – an automated feedback tool that promises to deliver leadership coaching at scale without requiring additional staffing resources.
The tool combines customisable leadership surveys with AI-powered insights, designed to create what MultiRater calls ‘an online leadership coach’ for supervisors, team leaders, managers and executives. The proposition is simple: extend executive-level development tools to every level of management at a fraction of traditional costs.
‘Our partnership with MultiRater Surveys empowers our HR community to build stronger leadership capabilities and competencies,’ said Debbie McGrath, Chief Instigator and CEO of HR.com. ‘By , we strive to help HR professionals advance their careers and prepare for the evolving challenges of the future workplace.’
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss a story. No spam, ever.

Canadian firms demand L&D programmes show clear ROI—Cognota and Deloitte offer data-driven solutions linking employee training to real business impact

AI-driven recruitment reshapes hiring in India as tools like Ann promise faster, fairer talent management whilst keeping human judgement at the centre

JELD-WEN’s 11% layoffs and a loss expose 2025’s uncertain construction market and pressure building products makers as supply chain and labour shortages bite.
The fundamental question remains: can automated, online coaches realistically offer the same value as traditional executive coaching? Recent meta-analyses confirm that traditional executive coaching effectively improves leadership behaviours, attitudes and goal attainment. However, it’s resource-intensive and difficult to scale.
Automated coaching tools offer greater accessibility and scalability but lack the personalised, relational depth of human coaching. The emerging consensus suggests that hybrid models combining automated tools with traditional coaching may represent the future of leadership development.
Australian companies are already experimenting with this approach. Valence, an Australian AI-powered leadership platform, has demonstrated a 5% uptick in leadership effectiveness by blending AI with human coaching for enterprise clients. However, controlled trials directly comparing automated and traditional methods remain limited.
The advantages of automated coaching are compelling: dramatically lower costs, unlimited scalability and accessibility for mid-level managers who’ve traditionally been excluded from development programmes. Platforms like Monark and BetterUp have shown they can engage thousands of users simultaneously, something impossible with traditional one-on-one coaching.
Yet significant questions remain. Can personal growth be meaningfully measured through survey insights alone? Will employees engage with automated programmes over human coaching? Early adopters report mixed results – high initial engagement but questions about long-term behaviour change and retention of learning.
The cost argument is particularly relevant as budgets tighten. Traditional leadership programmes require significant upfront investment with uncertain returns, while automated tools offer measurable metrics and lower financial risk. For mid-sized companies particularly, this could mean the difference between offering no leadership development or providing something for all managers.
The DDI research shows a leadership pipeline crisis that won’t resolve itself. With only 12% of organisations confident in their leadership bench strength, businesses face a choice: invest in scalable development solutions or continue leaving mid-level managers to develop themselves.
Automated coaching tools won’t replace the nuanced guidance of experienced executive coaches, but they might democratise access to development resources that have been exclusive to senior leaders. As budgets tighten and leadership expectations rise, every business will have to weigh the value of automated development against the cost of doing nothing.
The partnership between HR.com and MultiRater Surveys represents a move towards making leadership development tools available to all people managers, not just those at the top. Whether this approach can fill the leadership readiness gap remains to be seen, but the alternative – continuing to leave mid-level managers without development support – seems increasingly untenable.
team leaders, managers and executives. A Shrinking Market for Management Talent As Employee Experience Takes the Hit
Learning and Development functions in Canadian companies are also under pressure to demonstrate measurable value and ROI, reflecting a wider trend across business operations.

Rocketing RSU values at Nvidia and Broadcom boost retention but squeeze mobility. HR should rebalance pay-equity mixes, add acceleration and sustain engagement.